Jun 17, 2009, 06:55 PM // 18:55
|
#41
|
Indeed
|
The following in an interesting read if you really want to discuss this subject.
"To be is to be perceived." - Berkeley
"… I am content to put the whole upon this issue; if you can but conceive it possible for one extended moveable substance, or in general, for any one idea or any thing like an idea, to exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving it, I shall readily give up the cause…. But say you, surely there is nothing easier than to imagine trees, for instance, in a park, or books existing in a closet, and no body by to perceive them. I answer, you may so, there is no difficulty in it: but what is all this, I beseech you, more than framing in your mind certain ideas which you call books and trees, and at the same time omitting to frame the idea of any one that may perceive them? But do not you your self perceive or think of them all the while? This therefore is nothing to the purpose: it only shows you have the power of imagining or forming ideas in your mind; but it doth not shew that you can conceive it possible, the objects of your thought may exist without the mind: to make out this, it is necessary that you conceive them existing unconceived or unthought of, which is a manifest repugnancy. When we do our utmost to conceive the existence of external bodies, we are all the while only contemplating our own ideas. But the mind taking no notice of itself, is deluded to think it can and doth conceive bodies existing unthought of or without the mind; though at the same time they are apprehended by or exist in it self." - Berkeley
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/berkeley/
__________________
"You're never as bad and you're never as good as you think you are."
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2009, 07:26 PM // 19:26
|
#42
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: behind you
Guild: bumble bee
Profession: E/
|
/kick berkeley where it hurts for hurting my eyes.
as for the question, off course it make a sound.
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2009, 08:36 PM // 20:36
|
#43
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Planet Earth, Sol system, Milky Way galaxy
Guild: [ban]
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by distilledwill
Sound is the name we give to the effect when the vibrations of the molecules in the air are interpreted by our ears (or, yes i suppose, the vibrations are picked up by some recording device). So, sound is socially constructed.
Does it make a SOUND? No
Does the air vibrate? Yes
Something is real if it is real in its consequences.
A sound has no consequence if noone hears it. The sound, therefore, is not real.
|
That is only one definition of sound. Another definition is:
Quote:
mechanical radiant energy that is transmitted by longitudinal pressure waves in a material medium (as air) and is the objective cause of hearing
|
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sound[3]
You can't say something makes no sound because of the definition of sound if the definition of sound includes a definition of the actual effect. That redundant sentence was redundant.
edit: Google says trees falling make a sound when no one is there to hear them, so it must be so.
Quote:
mechanical vibrations transmitted by an elastic medium; "falling trees make a sound in the forest even when no one is there to hear them"
|
Last edited by MisterB; Jun 17, 2009 at 08:43 PM // 20:43..
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2009, 09:10 PM // 21:10
|
#44
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: "Pre-nerf" is incorrect. It's pre-buff.
Guild: Requirement Begins With R [notQ]
Profession: Me/
|
Think of it from a different perspective.
If a man talks in a forest and his wife is not around, is he still wrong?
Food for thought.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2009, 12:41 AM // 00:41
|
#45
|
Site Contributor
|
I'll pop in. Sound is subjective, I think a lot of you are confusing and mixing vibration for sound. No, it makes no sound.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2009, 07:17 AM // 07:17
|
#46
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: behind you
Guild: bumble bee
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by makosi
Think of it from a different perspective.
If a man talks in a forest and his wife is not around, is he still wrong?
Food for thought.
|
men are always wrong so simple, do you need to ask?
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2009, 08:04 AM // 08:04
|
#47
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Jul 2008
Guild: Burninating the countryside
Profession: D/
|
If it didn't make the sound, then one could argue that it didn't visibly change either (until someone came upon it to see it). Then, it would become a question of whether it actually fell, since it looks exactly the same and hasn't made any noise (despite nobody knowing this) - I'd say no. Using this logic, which I would, you could arrive at the conclusion that the fact that we know this tree has fallen down in the first place means that there was a sound that was made, and that the tree would have been seen falling down, had there been anyone/thing to observe it.
Don't argue my logic - tired people always know what they're talking about.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2009, 09:09 AM // 09:09
|
#48
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Blighty
Guild: The Legion of the Blue Blade
Profession: R/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterB
That is only one definition of sound.
|
We could argue semantics till the cows come home, by your definition it does, by mine it doesnt.
Maybe we should look at it in a quantum way. Shrodinger's tree: as we cannot observe the tree falling it is both simultaneously making a sound and not making a sound.
|
|
|
Jun 19, 2009, 03:41 AM // 03:41
|
#49
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Zealand
Guild: None
|
Most likely, just because nobody is there does not mean no sound is made, however there is some crazy small chance, that the three could make no noise at all, wether someone is there or not.
There is no proof that it made a sound, but if you could conduct a study of trees falling that make sound, and compare those to trees falling that make no sound, find the probability, then apply this to said tree.
|
|
|
Jun 19, 2009, 07:37 AM // 07:37
|
#50
|
~ Retired ~
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark (GMT +1)
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkantos
The question should be more interesting.
If three squirrels are in a forest having sex, and no one is around, do they make a sound? I don't even know if they make a sound when someone is around. Tricky.
|
The original OP question is an old and tired philosophical cliché.
This is a much more interesting question! My guess would be: yes!
- Squirrels doesn't seem like quit animals to me.
- Redheads are said to have aggressive tempers.
- A quit threesome seems like a contradiction.
|
|
|
Jun 19, 2009, 11:18 AM // 11:18
|
#51
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mancland, British Empire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang Whirlwind
Redheads are said to have aggressive tempers.
|
That aggressive temper is also apply to the bedroom department, fact.
|
|
|
Jun 19, 2009, 02:02 PM // 14:02
|
#52
|
The 5th Celestial Boss
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Inverness, Scotland
Guild: The Cult of Scaro [WHO]
Profession: E/
|
I'm going to go against most people and say no.
When a tree falls it creates vibrations which travel through the air, but as I understand it, if there is noone to turn those vibrations into something we can audibly detect and acknowledge as sound, I'm not convinced that if a tree falls and there is noone to hear it it does create a sound. This also goes for the argument about the microphone and tape recorder - it's basically an "ear substitute" for the purposes of this discussion.
My belief that unless something is there to turn the vibrations in the air into a format we can recognise as sound then they are just that; vibrations.
Of course you could argue that if there are vibrations then there is sound, but my feeling is that's a week argument since not all the components are there to convert the vibrations into sound, therefore that which is recognised as sound can't exist.
__________________
Knowledge is a process of piling up facts; wisdom lies in their simplification.
Last edited by Cebe; Jun 19, 2009 at 02:04 PM // 14:04..
|
|
|
Jun 19, 2009, 02:36 PM // 14:36
|
#53
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mancland, British Empire
|
Ok Cebe formerly know as Celestial Beaver. Listen here, if I farted and you didn't hear it, did I fart?
|
|
|
Jun 21, 2009, 07:14 AM // 07:14
|
#54
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: behind you
Guild: bumble bee
Profession: E/
|
Etta farted ....
|
|
|
Jun 21, 2009, 08:02 AM // 08:02
|
#55
|
Desert Nomad
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumpkin pie
Etta farted ....
|
"Who cares".
|
|
|
Jun 21, 2009, 08:08 AM // 08:08
|
#56
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: behind you
Guild: bumble bee
Profession: E/
|
its answer to his question. lol
|
|
|
Jun 23, 2009, 05:58 PM // 17:58
|
#57
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brussels - Belgium
Guild: Temple of Love
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkantos
The question should be more interesting.
If three squirrels are in a forest having sex, and no one is around, do they make a sound? I don't even know if they make a sound when someone is around. Tricky.
|
My guess is you won't hear the 2 having sex, but the 3th eating a nut you WILL hear...
|
|
|
Jun 24, 2009, 03:33 AM // 03:33
|
#58
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere between GW and GW2
Guild: Shaved Wookies [HoT]
Profession: N/
|
I'm not so sure about this one but here goes :P
I think it does make vibrations but what makes the sound is when the vibrations are translated into our brains as sound. Therefore, when there is no one within earshot (lol), it doesn't make a sound, just meaningless vibration. Remember, all the things we feel are just our translations of whats happening around us I think.
edit: oops. I didn't see Cebe's post. I just repeated what he said lol. sorry!
|
|
|
Jun 24, 2009, 03:35 AM // 03:35
|
#59
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: behind you
Guild: bumble bee
Profession: E/
|
No kazi saki, it does make a sound, the reason why most people including me says it does is because the question is asked wrongly.
should have ask: if you know fallen trees make sound, but you did not hear it, does the sound exist?
or
I see all the post being posted on this forum, but I've never seen anyone of you before in real life, do you people exist?
Do I exist?
Last edited by pumpkin pie; Jun 24, 2009 at 03:37 AM // 03:37..
|
|
|
Jun 24, 2009, 01:54 PM // 13:54
|
#60
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Dec 2008
Guild: Whatever Floats Your [Boat]
Profession: A/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumpkin pie
No kazi saki, it does make a sound, the reason why most people including me says it does is because the question is asked wrongly.
should have ask: if you know fallen trees make sound, but you did not hear it, does the sound exist?
or
I see all the post being posted on this forum, but I've never seen anyone of you before in real life, do you people exist?
Do I exist?
|
You don't have too. For all we know you aren't real. The Board that we are posting on isn't real and our feeble fabrication of the world isn't real.
For all we know not one of us is truly existent at all. A philosopher once said "I think, therefor I am", but is that truly so? We think, yes, and we have self awareness. Does that make us real though?
Philosophy cannot be debated because none of it can be proven.
Oh and by the way, the question WAS asked wrong, the proper question is...
If a tree falls in the forest, and nothing is around to hear it, does it still make a sound?
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 AM // 01:00.
|